The Optimist
  • Home
  • About
    • Advertise
    • Policies
    • Staff Contacts
    • Jobs
  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Editorials
  • Multimedia
    • Photo Galleries
    • Videos
  • Features
  • Print Edition
    • The Pessimist
    • Special Projects
  • Police Log
  • Classifieds
You are here: Home / Opinion / Columns / Text abbreviations do not belong in conversation

Text abbreviations do not belong in conversation

October 1, 2010 by Juliana Kocsis

OMG. This is OOMWPP, BTW. Why do we AENAD? In MOO, using TL outside of TM is SNF.

Translation: Oh my goodness. This is one of my worst pet peeves, by the way. Why do we abbreviate everything nowadays? In my own opinion, using texting lingo outside of text messages is so not funny.

Before I begin my non-abbreviated diatribe against using texting lingo in everyday communication, I will admit that it does serve a purpose in 160-character-limit text messages. The 14 fewer characters in JK BTW versus “just kidding, by the way” can prove quite helpful.

As the name suggests, however, “texting lingo” is for texts and should be avoided entirely in every other other form of communication.

Facebook posts cut off at 1,000 characters, which is more than enough room to spell out every “by the way,” “oh my goodness” and “laughing out loud” for your friends and stalkers to see. Facebook messages have no limit at all, and neither do good old-fashioned e-mails, unless you can fill 10 MB with text. Conversations, especially, are no place for keypad acronyms.

My critics might point out that as an English major and copy editor I am predisposed to hate all abbreviations and deviations from strict grammatical and syntactical standards. I must admit that I edit billboards for word choice and menus for comma splices, and that my MLA style sensors go on emergency alert with the first spelling mistake in an e-mail.

But my own idiosyncracies aside, there are more important reasons why I am so frustrated with the proliferation of texting lingo outside of texts. To me, OMGs, JKs and LOLs on Facebook, blog posts and – worst of all – in conversations, suggest a disintegrating concern for language and personal communication. An LOL in an e-mail only serves to remind me that I am talking to a computer screen. A BTW dropped in a face-to-face conversation makes whoever I’m talking to a cell phone screen.

If we allow it to seep into our writings and conversations, texting lingo may spell an imminent linguistic and social decay in society. We may forget how to spell and how to construct a complete sentence, and the English language will be reduced to a set of capital letters strung together (or lowercase letters if we can’t be bothered to hit the shift key). We ourselves will become walking Blackberries and iPhones, who laugh in obnoxious LOLs and express ourselves in digitized emoticons.

Does this mean that I will refuse to respond to Facebook posts and e-mails that include the dreaded texting lingo and run away at the first sign of it in a conversation? Yes, that’s exactly what I mean.

JK, not really. 🙂

Filed Under: Columns

Other Opinion:

  • Letter from the editor: Learning to lead

  • Online classes are not as effective as they seem

  • Athletes today face pressure from every angle

About Juliana Kocsis

You are here: Home / Opinion / Columns / Text abbreviations do not belong in conversation

Other Opinion:

  • Letter from the editor: Learning to lead

  • Online classes are not as effective as they seem

  • Athletes today face pressure from every angle

Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Optimist on Twitter

acuoptimist The Optimist @acuoptimist ·
9 May

BREAKING: The 2026 teacher of the year is Dr. Clint Buck, assistant professor of accounting in the College of Business Administration.

Reply on Twitter 2053158226070257771 Retweet on Twitter 2053158226070257771 Like on Twitter 2053158226070257771 2 Twitter 2053158226070257771
acuoptimist The Optimist @acuoptimist ·
4 May

BREAKING NEWS: James Bradshaw and Maddie Grace Fridge are the 2026 Mr. ACU and Miss ACU.

Reply on Twitter 2051110655172784350 Retweet on Twitter 2051110655172784350 Like on Twitter 2051110655172784350 4 Twitter 2051110655172784350

Optimist on Facebook

The Optimist updated their status.

1 month ago

The Optimist

This content isn't available right now

When this happens, it's usually because the owner only shared it with a small group of people, changed who can see it or it's been deleted.
View on Facebook
· Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email

The Optimist

2 months ago

The Optimist
Click the link in our bio to nominate a graduating senior for the Optimist to feature in our print issue. ... See MoreSee Less

Video

View on Facebook
· Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email

Videos

Optimist Newscast Feb. 28, 2024

Our top stories today include a recap of The Musical Comedy Murders of 1940, the ... [Read More…]

  • Optimist Newscast Feb. 21, 2024
  • Optimist Newscast Feb. 14, 2024
  • Optimist Newscast Jan. 24, 2024

Latest Photos

  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
    • Subscribe
    • Policies
    • Advertising Policy
    • Letters to the Editor and Reader Comments
  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Editorials
  • Multimedia
    • Videos
    • Photo Galleries
  • Features
  • Advertise
    • Paid Advertisement
  • Police Log

© 2026 ACU Optimist · All Rights Reserved