Optimist
  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Editorials
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Features
    • Book Review
  • Multimedia
    • Photo Galleries
    • Videos
  • Podcasts
    • Optimist Overtime
    • Top of the Key
  • Police Log
  • Print Edition
  • Projects
  • About
    • Advertise
    • Policies
    • Staff Contacts
    • Jobs
You are here: Home / Opinion / Columns / Ivory towers and academic bias

Ivory towers and academic bias

February 22, 2022 by Allie Jones Leave a Comment

How do professors handle conversations of diversity if they can’t identify with the group?

Last semester I was in a film class where, as the only female, I had a very educating experience. I’m pretty privileged.

I’m pretty privileged to belong to a female dominated major, at a female dominated university, so this atmosphere was a little shocking.

But I figured I could use this as an opportunity to share my experiences and learn from theirs. What I didn’t realize was that my opinions about the female experience might not be welcomed. 

My opinion of the class changed when the professor presented on the male gaze. We spent a total of an hour of class discussing the male gaze and the bias in the film industry. I was thrilled that we were finally covering an aspect of film I was passionate about. But after that class period the professor never brought up the topic again. Like the problem could be shoved into a box and forgotten. 

To this professor, he had done his due diligence. He introduced the class to the idea of a problem, putting it in their hands. This bare minimum approach kept the class tethering on the edge between hypocritical and happily ignorant. This didn’t keep me from trying to add my own experience to the discussion on the female experience in film. Unfortunately, it seemed like I had put in a little too much hope in the professor when they said not to be surprised at the sexism in the course material and just focus on the lesson. 

Fine. That’s just fine. I can ignore how all of the films revolved around a male lead or how none of the films showed vanity in sexuality. I can even ignore the fact that the majority of the films covered in this class couldn’t even pass the Bechdel test.

But the fact is I shouldn’t have too. The professor brought up the topics of male gaze and film bias. The professor chose films that withheld the bias and ignored films with minority representation that could be used to teach the same lessons. Why should it be my job to look past detrimental stereotypes just so we can talk about the use of the color red?

I don’t speak for all women and I certainly don’t speak for all members of a minority group but I can speak for myself. I can share my experience to hopefully add to the conversation and I can shut up and listen when others are talking about their experiences. Which is why I find it so odd that a professor couldn’t do the same. 

Bringing up problems with diversity in academia are not only welcomed, it is now the bare minimum in educational environments. Professors should create a space where they can present the facts and then, if they are willing, allow the student to add their experiences to the conversation. If you find they are adding too much to the conversation, maybe you should take a look at your course material.

If, as an educator, you are not sure how to teach over a group you do not fall into I would recommend following in the footsteps of Bill Carroll. During the first week of Poetry 378, Professor Carroll explained that as a “straight white cis-man” he is obviously coming from a specific background but that in this class he wanted to showcase voices from different backgrounds. We covered diversity in racial minority, gender minority, sexual minority, economic minority and even voices from different religious backgrounds. 

The time is past for us to use lack of resources as an excuse for not including voices outside of your own, especially in literature or fine art degrees. At this point it is just willful ignorance.

Filed Under: Columns, Opinion

Other Opinion:

  • Not-so-friendly competition

  • Sing Song in the Expo Center presents an exciting opportunity

  • Micro-trends are a danger to Gen Z and the planet

About Allie Jones

Leave a Comment: Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You are here: Home / Opinion / Columns / Ivory towers and academic bias

Other Opinion:

  • Not-so-friendly competition

  • Sing Song in the Expo Center presents an exciting opportunity

  • Micro-trends are a danger to Gen Z and the planet

Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Optimist on Twitter

acuoptimistThe Optimist@acuoptimist·
4 May

"Maybe we just don’t care enough. But if we do start caring, and if we become the loudest fans in the WAC, let’s stick to supportive cheering." Read more from Guest Columnist Londyn Gray:
https://acuoptimist.com/2022/04/not-so-friendly-competition/

Reply on Twitter 1521918832738144257Retweet on Twitter 15219188327381442571Like on Twitter 15219188327381442578Twitter 1521918832738144257
acuoptimistThe Optimist@acuoptimist·
3 May

Royce Clough and Jael Morel have been named as Mr. and Miss ACU for the class of 2022, a traditional honor voted on by the student body and awarded to two members of each graduating class.

Reply on Twitter 1521607087553458178Retweet on Twitter 1521607087553458178Like on Twitter 152160708755345817819Twitter 1521607087553458178

Optimist on Facebook

The Optimist

3 weeks ago

The Optimist
"Maybe we just don’t care enough. But if we do start caring, and if we become the loudest fans in the WAC, let’s stick to supportive cheering." Read more from Guest Columnist Londyn Gray: ... See MoreSee Less

Not-so-friendly competition - Optimist

acuoptimist.com

BY: LONDYN GRAY “Number 18, you look like you don’t shower!” I chuckled and shrugged it off. “Londyn!” They had looked up the roster. “Do you even brush your teeth?” I laughed again, rol...
View on Facebook
· Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email

The Optimist

3 weeks ago

The Optimist
Cullen Auditorium is expected to be handed over to the university in June 2022, alongside a name change that coupled with the renovation will create new future for the Cornerstone class, Chapel and the Department of Theatre. ... See MoreSee Less

Cullen Auditorium still set for a name change alongside renovations - Optimist

acuoptimist.com

Cullen Auditorium is expected to be handed over to the university in June 2022, alongside a name change that coupled with the renovation will create new future for the Cornerstone class, Chapel and th...
View on Facebook
· Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email

Videos

Women’s tournament run ended by first-round exit against UTRGV

The Wildcats’ Western Athletic Conference tournament run and season came to a ... [Read More…]

  • Optimist Newscast Feb. 22. 2022
  • Optimist Newscast 2.16.2022
  • Optimist Newscast 2.9.2022

Latest Photos

  • Home
  • Weekly Ads
  • Classifieds

© 2022 ACU Optimist · All Rights Reserved

Posting....